Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] This paper investigates the themes and contents of Open Access Week (OA Week) activities at home and abroad over the years, in order to summarize the focus of OA Week and the development of open access, and to propose the enlightenment and suggestions for promoting open access in China. [Method/process] Using the online survey method, this paper investigated the international Open Access Week Website and the OA Week event Websites of the United States, the United Kingdom, Australia, Spain, Japan and China, and summarized the themes, contents and forms of the OA Week events. [Result/conclusion] The development of open access is from concept discussion to practical action, from open access to open science, from green road to golden road, and from decentralized action to global joint. In promoting open access, we should pay attention to human factors; enrich the content of activities and promotion forms; grasp the development trend of open science and strengthen infrastructure construction; promote the role of professional institutions and participate in global joint actions.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Information Science submitted time 2023-04-01 Cooperative journals: 《图书情报工作》
Abstract： [Purpose/significance] To understand the research and practice status of library publishing at home and abroad, summarize the hot research topics, summarize the current practice progress, and put forward development suggestions.[Method/process] This paper adopted the literature research method and network survey method to investigate and analyze the research and practice status of library publishing in recent ten years at home and abroad.[Result/conclusion] On the basis of comparative analysis of research and practice at home and abroad, this paper puts forward suggestions to future research and practice of library and publications from 5 aspects, which include enriching library publishing research, standardizing the mechanism of library publishing, improving library publishing service capabilities, integrating into academic publishing ecosystem, and providing academic publishing copyright service. The above suggestions are expected to be beneficial to the research and practice of library publishing in China.
Subjects: Other Disciplines >> Synthetic discipline submitted time 2023-03-31 Cooperative journals: 《农业图书情报学报》
Abstract： [Purpose/Significance] At present, there is relatively little research on the open science (OS) policy at the level of scientific research institutions in China, while some preliminary explorations have been made abroad. The text analysis of OS policies of representative scientific research institutions and lessons drawn from their policy making experience can provide a good reference for the formulation of OS policies by Chinese scientific research institutions. It gives play to the main role of scientific research institutions in the OS process, and promotes the practice of OS from bottom to top. [Method/Process] Based on the perspective of policy tools, this paper uses the content analysis method to conduct quantitative analysis on 12 OS policy texts published by international scientific research institutions. It establishes an X -Y two-dimensional analysis framework for OS policy of scientific research institutions. The content analysis categories are as follows: policy instrument dimension (X dimension) - authority, incentive, symbol and exhortation, capacity building, and system change; OS content factor dimension (Y dimension) - open content, open process, open infrastructure, and open cooperation. This paper carries out research through the X -Y two-dimensional analysis framework, aiming to reveal the use of policy tool preferences and policy content focus on the tendency, refining the key factors of research institutions' OS policy, putting forward the policy tool optimization strategy and providing insights into Chinese scientific research institutions in formulating OS policies. [Results/Conclusions] From the dimension of policy tools, capacity building tools are more used, followed by authority tools, and other policy tools are less used. From the dimension of OS content elements, the eight themes of open data, open access, OS education and training, open cooperation, open evaluation, open infrastructure, open incentive and citizen science are the main concerns in the OS policies issued by international research institutions. The use of OS policy tools in scientific research institutions should coordinate with each other, optimize the combination of policy tools; try to solve the actual problems, strengthen the internal balance of policy tools; adjust measures to local conditions and make full use of differences in policy tools. In formulating OS policies, scientific research institutions should further integrate themselves into the international OS tide, understand the development trend, and ensure the forward-looking of policies; adjust and optimize the organizational structure, clarify the division of responsibilities, and promote open scientific practice in an overall way; the core elements and key issues of OS policies should be grasped when formulating policies; and in the process of policy formulation and implementation, they should ensure the investment of funds, as well as timely dynamic adjustment.
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2022-06-11
Abstract：
[Purpose/Significance] At present, there is relatively little research and practice on the open science policy at the level of scientific research institutions in China, while some preliminary explorations have been made abroad. The text analysis of open science policies of representative scientific research institutions and draw lessons from their policy making experience can provide a good reference for the formulation of dominant file of open science for Chinese scientific research institutions, further give play to the main role of scientific research institutions in the process of open science, and promote the practice of open science from bottom to top. [Method/Process] Based on the perspective of policy tools, this paper uses the content analysis method to conduct quantitative analysis on 12 open science policy texts published by foreign scientific research institutions. This paper establishes an X-Y two-dimensional analysis framework for open science policy of scientific research institutions. The content analysis categories are as follows: policy instrument dimension (X dimension) -- authority, incentive, symbol and exhortation, capacity building, system change; open science content factor dimension (Y dimension) -- open content, open process, open infrastructure, open cooperation. This paper carries out research through the X-Y two-dimensional analysis framework, aims to reveal the use of policy tools preferences and policy content focus on the tendency, refining the key factors of research institutions’ open science policy, and putting forward the policy tool optimization strategy and the enlightenments for Chinese scientific research institutions to formulate open science policy. [Results/Conclusions] From the dimension of policy tools, capacity building tools are more used, followed by authority tools, and other policy tools are less used. From the dimension of open science content elements, the eight themes of open data, open access, open science education and training, open cooperation, open evaluation, open infrastructure, open incentive and citizen science are the main concerns in the open science policy issued by foreign research institutions. The use of open science policy tools in scientific research institutions should: coordinate with each other, optimize the combination of policy tools; close to the actual problems, strengthen the internal balance of policy tools; adjust measures to local conditions and make full use of differences in policy tools. In formulating open science policies, scientific research institutions should: further integrate themselves into the international open science tide, know very well the development trend, and ensure the forward-looking of policies; adjust and optimize the organizational structure, clarify the division of responsibilities, and promote open scientific practice in an overall way; the core elements and key issues of open science policy should be grasped when formulating policies; and in the process of policy formulation and implementation, ensure the investment of funds, as well as timely dynamic adjustment.
Peer Review Status:
Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2022-03-18
Abstract：探究人工智能时代数字图书馆发展的新方向，推进国内智慧图书馆建设发展。剖析数字图书馆与智慧图书馆之间的联系与区别，为智慧图书馆建设提出发展要求，包括正视智能技术带来的机遇挑战，保障持续变化的技术支撑；把握智慧图书馆的建设目标，稳步推进智慧图书馆建设发展；不断提升服务能力，强化图书馆的知识服务与智慧服务。智慧图书馆建设应始终围绕需求牵引，技术驱动，服务主导，能力检验这一基本原则，加快图书馆向智慧图书馆转型升级。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Hits
Hits
Downloads
Comment