Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2022-01-06
Abstract： "
Peer Review Status:
Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2022-04-29
Abstract： <p>Purposes This paper explores the research progress and the implementation status of author contribution statement(ACS), so as to provide reference for related research in the future.</p><p>Methods Through literature review and case study, this paper summarizes the research progress in the field of author contribution statement and the current situation of implementing the author contribution statement.</p><p>Findings The studies on ACS mainly focus on five aspects: authorship qualification and ranking, disclosure form, author contribution elements, authorship weight and author contribution network. As for the application of ACS, low adoption and irregular form of ACS are two main problems.</p><p>Conclusions It is recommended to promote the implementation of ACS and build the metadata system of ACS based on CrediT combined with ORCID. Additionally, editors need to supervise the implementation process.</p>
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2017-05-10
Abstract：摘要：[目的/意义] 构建普适的领域本体模型框架和规范的方法体系，为 STKOS 实现动态摘要：[目的/意义] 构建普适的领域本体模型框架和规范的方法体系，为 STKOS 实现动态建模的本体工具集和面向领域应用的本体网络提供建设依据。[方法/过程] 调研分析不同层次的领域本体模型，总结能够为 STKOS 本体建设提供的参考，构建 STKOS 中学科领域本体模型的三层架构，提出各层框架可遵循的方法，并以中国科学院植物研究所的需求为例，阐述了本文模型框架在构建植物多样性领域本体的应用。[结果/结论] 按照领域本体模型三层架构所构建的植物多样性领域本体，较之其他领域本体，具有知识组织体系清晰、构建过程高效、所支撑应用场景丰富的优点，因此，该研究为 STKOS 快速而有效地构建领域本体提供了实用框架，未来可应用于知识服务平台语义层的建设。
Peer Review Status:Awaiting Review
Subjects: Library Science，Information Science >> Library Science submitted time 2025-01-02
Abstract： ［Purposes］This paper aims to investigate the involvement of high-level scientists in the editorial boards of scientific journals, organize the structure of these editorial boards, and analyze the significant role they play from the scientists´ perspective. It objectively presents the current state of scientists´ participation in the development of scientific journals. ［Methods］We investigated the data of high-level scientists through online research, analyzed the composition and size of the editorial boards of the representative scientific journals in China, and explored the current situation of scientists´ participation in the construction of scientific journals through questionnaires and interviews. ［Findings］The number and proportion of high-level scientists serving as editorial board members of scientific journals are related to the quality of the journals, and the size of the editorial board is related to the influence of the journals. The roles played by editorial board members in journals are more consistent with the expectations of the journal´s editors. However, there are discrepancies in certain aspects. ［Conclusions］The number and proportion of high-level scientists in editorial boards are related to the quality of scientific journals. While the role played by scientists as editorial board members basically meets the expectations of editors, the contribution of scientists serving on editorial boards of scientific journals still requires systematic and multidimensional evaluation.
Hits
Hits
Downloads
Comment
YES