Abstract:
Purposes To explore the problems and obstacles in the process of exercising the reviewers' academic discourse right, and to explore the enhancement strategies of the reviewers' academic discourse right, so as to provide reference for optimizing the peer review mechanism. Methods Systematically sort out the review process, clarify the rights and obligations of each subject, establish a model for the operation mechanism of reviewers' academic discourse right, and propose optimization strategies for the current situation of reviewers' academic discourse rights. Findings The model proposed in this paper can effectively simulate the peer review process under the ideal state, which provides a clear perspective for the in-depth examination of the game process of different players competing for academic discourse, and also provides an opportunity to find strategies to enhance the academic discourse of reviewers. Conclusions The establishment of a standardized peer review process and a perfect incentive mechanism can provide better protection for reviewers to exercise their right to academic discourse, promote the formation of a good academic ecology, and promote academic prosperity.